BTC $79,675.94 -1.82%
ETH $2,451.83 -1.75%
BNB $718.48 -0.73%
XRP $1.40 -3.81%
SOL $101.75 -2.98%
TRX $0.3315 +0.16%
DOGE $0.0846 -3.55%
ADA $0.2107 -4.18%
BCH $252.05 -2.59%
LINK $11.64 -2.10%
HYPE $84.10 -1.71%
AAVE $129.74 -2.99%
SUI $0.7536 -3.40%
XLM $0.1794 -3.21%
ZEC $1,023.02 +8.12%
BTC $79,675.94 -1.82%
ETH $2,451.83 -1.75%
BNB $718.48 -0.73%
XRP $1.40 -3.81%
SOL $101.75 -2.98%
TRX $0.3315 +0.16%
DOGE $0.0846 -3.55%
ADA $0.2107 -4.18%
BCH $252.05 -2.59%
LINK $11.64 -2.10%
HYPE $84.10 -1.71%
AAVE $129.74 -2.99%
SUI $0.7536 -3.40%
XLM $0.1794 -3.21%
ZEC $1,023.02 +8.12%

void

All
Article
Flash

first_img The cryptocurrency industry urges the U.S. SEC to avoid implementing a one-size-fits-all restriction on new ETFs

According to Cointelegraph, participants in the crypto industry such as a16z, Grayscale, and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) urged the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to avoid implementing a one-size-fits-all restriction on "novel" exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and instead assess them based on individual risk parameters. Three comment letters were submitted on August 31, just as the SEC's 60-day window for public comments on the regulation of new ETFs was nearing its end. The SEC launched this consultation on June 30, seeking opinions on whether existing regulations are sufficient, how such funds should be regulated, and whether the registration process needs adjustments.a16z believes that crypto-based ETPs have now benefited from more mature market infrastructure, including exchange-approved listing standards and established disclosure requirements, and therefore should not be grouped with products that hold private assets or adopt other novel strategies. Grayscale similarly argues that digital asset products with mature compliance and disclosure records should not face new portfolio conditions or disclosure regimes simply because they are classified as "novel." CCI called for comparable regulatory efficiency between ETFs and non-ETF ETPs while retaining existing investor protection measures.There is widespread opposition to potential regulatory adjustments that could impose additional requirements or delay product launches, but there are differences in classification, approval processes, and terminology. The dispute over the ETF label is particularly pronounced: a16z proposed that the term ETF be used only for funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940, while Grayscale believes that ETFs should describe economic characteristics rather than legal shells.

hot_img Micron will issue the highest performance bonuses in history to avoid worker strikes

According to Reuters, Micron Technology's unions in Taoyuan and Taichung, Taiwan are preparing for a strike. The union claims to represent nearly 10,000 of Micron's approximately 15,000 employees in the two locations, and an internal survey shows that over 80% of members support the strike. The core of the labor dispute revolves around bonus distribution— the union believes that the current incentive plan does not adequately reflect the company's profitability and is demanding a one-time additional bonus for this fiscal year, as well as a shift to quarterly profit sharing of 15% of operating profits starting from the 2027 fiscal year. Micron previously responded that it would issue the highest performance bonuses in history, but the union believes the company has not adequately explained the performance calculation method, and it seems to be more closely tied to revenue rather than profit.As the world's third-largest memory chip manufacturer, Micron reported revenue of $41.46 billion and a net profit of $28.24 billion in the third fiscal quarter, with a market capitalization of approximately $1.1 trillion. Taiwan is Micron's largest manufacturing base, with a cumulative investment of NT$1.4 trillion, producing DRAM and HBM. If the strike proceeds, it may impact the global memory chip supply. The Taichung Science Park Administration stated that it is closely monitoring the situation and has prepared a labor mediation mechanism. Previously, the Samsung union also raised similar profit-sharing demands and obtained a special bonus pool of 10.5% of the chip division's operating profits after negotiations.

Keeta sent a letter to the hacker after the attack: Return the funds within 72 hours to avoid accountability

Regarding the recent attack on the payment public chain Keeta, Keeta Network CEO Ty sent a letter to the attackers stating that the investigation has made substantial progress and evidence has been collected that can identify the attackers. This includes information on the IP addresses related to the attack, the VPN and VPS infrastructure used, the user agents and technical environment that initiated unauthorized requests, relevant email addresses, the software used, and the infrastructure service providers. The relevant evidence has been preserved and submitted to the authorities.The attackers are required to return all funds obtained from this attack within 72 hours, with repayment acceptable in KTA, ETH, or USDC. If the full amount is returned, a certain reward will be offered, and the matter will be resolved without pursuing legal responsibility. If the deadline is exceeded and the funds are not returned, all rights to pursue legal action and fund recovery will be reserved. Ty previously stated that the root cause of the security incident has been confirmed and patches are being tested. The issue is an isolated problem with the affected components and does not impact Keeta's anchor system or any external connection systems. All KTA on Base has not been affected. The Keeta mainnet will remain in read-only status until the patches are fully tested and appropriate additional safeguards are implemented before resuming full operation. The team is actively assessing the best way to fully compensate all affected users.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.