BTC $63,147.95 -2.64%
ETH $1,835.93 -4.50%
BNB $569.64 -2.43%
XRP $1.08 -2.77%
SOL $74.75 -3.21%
TRX $0.3217 -0.68%
DOGE $0.0719 -2.95%
ADA $0.1593 -3.26%
BCH $222.96 +0.29%
LINK $8.25 -3.48%
HYPE $58.96 -11.54%
AAVE $90.56 -5.89%
SUI $0.7355 -2.79%
XLM $0.1834 -2.91%
ZEC $533.39 -6.36%
BTC $63,147.95 -2.64%
ETH $1,835.93 -4.50%
BNB $569.64 -2.43%
XRP $1.08 -2.77%
SOL $74.75 -3.21%
TRX $0.3217 -0.68%
DOGE $0.0719 -2.95%
ADA $0.1593 -3.26%
BCH $222.96 +0.29%
LINK $8.25 -3.48%
HYPE $58.96 -11.54%
AAVE $90.56 -5.89%
SUI $0.7355 -2.79%
XLM $0.1834 -2.91%
ZEC $533.39 -6.36%

ruling

All
Article
Flash

Circle had previously banned accounts of crypto funds supported by Tether, but later received an arbitration ruling in support

According to the Financial Times, based on the latest publicly available court documents, the stablecoin issuer Circle had banned the crypto fund Heka Funds, supported by Tether, at the end of 2023 due to suspicions that it was manipulating the market through large-scale arbitrage operations and helping Tether expand its market share. The documents show that during the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) crisis in 2023, USDC briefly fell below the $1 peg. Heka continuously bought discounted USDC in large quantities and redeemed it for cash from Circle. Circle believed that Heka's redemption scale far exceeded that of other market participants and suspected that the related funds ultimately flowed to Tether to help expand its USDT market size.Arbitration documents also revealed that Tether had invested about $800 million in Heka, accounting for about 75% of the fund's assets, and waived the stablecoin minting fees. The arbitrator found that Heka did not truthfully disclose its supportive relationship with Tether and was aware that the related information would raise concerns for Circle. In 2024, Heka initiated arbitration due to its account being frozen, claiming approximately $49 million in lost profits. In February of this year, the arbitrator dismissed all of Heka's claims, determining that it had engaged in malicious behavior and ordered it to pay Circle about $166,000 in attorney and expert fees. Heka denied any market manipulation and stated that it had never been subject to regulatory investigation; Circle declined to comment, and Tether did not respond to media requests for comment.

Uniswap's motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit over fraudulent tokens was fully granted, with the court ruling that the platform is not responsible for third-party actions

A U.S. federal judge ruled to dismiss the remaining state law claims against Uniswap Labs and its founder Hayden Adams, ending a years-long class action lawsuit.The plaintiffs attempted to hold the platform liable for losses incurred from "scam tokens" traded on the Uniswap protocol. Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York issued the ruling on Monday, dismissing the plaintiffs' second amended complaint "with prejudice," stating that the plaintiffs failed to present a viable legal claim. The court noted that the plaintiffs had multiple opportunities to amend their complaint but still could not demonstrate that Uniswap was responsible for the misconduct of unnamed third-party token issuers.The plaintiffs claimed to have suffered losses due to actions such as "rug pulls" and "pump-and-dump" schemes, arguing that Uniswap "aided fraud" by providing a platform for buyers and sellers to trade. However, the court clearly stated that merely providing a decentralized trading platform does not constitute "substantial assistance" to fraudulent activities. Judge Failla reiterated her previous view that holding developers of smart contract code responsible for the abusive actions of third parties on decentralized platforms is "logically difficult to sustain."The case was initially filed in 2022 and originally included federal securities law claims. The related securities claims were dismissed in 2023, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling, remanding the remaining state law claims to the district court for consideration. This ruling signifies the formal conclusion of the case and further tightens the boundaries of state law liability for DeFi platform developers.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.