BTC $82,773.23 -0.03%
ETH $2,442.62 -0.16%
BNB $739.87 -0.30%
XRP $1.35 +0.95%
SOL $105.42 -0.55%
TRX $0.3299 -0.30%
DOGE $0.0801 -1.87%
ADA $0.2200 -1.34%
BCH $279.00 -2.12%
LINK $12.25 -0.75%
HYPE $78.88 -2.43%
AAVE $150.16 -3.20%
SUI $1.00 -2.15%
XLM $0.1800 -0.69%
ZEC $1,285.98 +1.71%
AAPL $344.27 +1.68%
AMZN $260.20 -1.48%
GOOGL $331.94 -2.95%
MSFT $529.87 +0.22%
META $707.53 +1.01%
NVDA $218.67 -0.93%
TSLA $369.71 -2.65%
SNDK $1,337.12 -4.86%
INTC $89.61 -5.33%
SPCX $156.69 -3.16%
MU $890.41 -3.28%
AMD $536.22 -2.29%
BTC $82,773.23 -0.03%
ETH $2,442.62 -0.16%
BNB $739.87 -0.30%
XRP $1.35 +0.95%
SOL $105.42 -0.55%
TRX $0.3299 -0.30%
DOGE $0.0801 -1.87%
ADA $0.2200 -1.34%
BCH $279.00 -2.12%
LINK $12.25 -0.75%
HYPE $78.88 -2.43%
AAVE $150.16 -3.20%
SUI $1.00 -2.15%
XLM $0.1800 -0.69%
ZEC $1,285.98 +1.71%
AAPL $344.27 +1.68%
AMZN $260.20 -1.48%
GOOGL $331.94 -2.95%
MSFT $529.87 +0.22%
META $707.53 +1.01%
NVDA $218.67 -0.93%
TSLA $369.71 -2.65%
SNDK $1,337.12 -4.86%
INTC $89.61 -5.33%
SPCX $156.69 -3.16%
MU $890.41 -3.28%
AMD $536.22 -2.29%

safe

Safe is a leading multi-signature wallet provider and digital asset management platform. Its smart contract wallet enables businesses to manage funds through predefined access control schemes with multiple private keys and other access modules.
All
Article
Flash

Anthropic CEO published a lengthy response to safety concerns, stating that it is necessary to stay at the forefront of technology

Anthropic recently submitted a draft AI safety bill to U.S. lawmakers, which has been questioned by U.S. AI safety advocates. The draft sets a high threshold for the government to urgently halt dangerous models, requiring that risks involve scenarios such as biological weapons, cyberattacks, or AI going out of control, and potentially causing more than 50 deaths or serious injuries, or losses exceeding $1 billion; some provisions may also limit state government regulatory authority.Nathan Calvin, the strategic head of the AI safety organization Encode, subsequently compiled Anthropic's decisions over the past year. In February of this year, the company modified its previously strict safety policy: it had previously committed to pausing training or releases if safety measures did not keep pace with model capabilities, but the new policy no longer requires the company to independently halt R&D at higher risk stages, citing that competitors might take advantage of the opportunity. During the same period, the company invested heavily in computing power, formed a chip team, and allowed Claude to take on more AI R&D tasks.On October 21, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei posted a lengthy rebuttal on X. He acknowledged that the company had made some mistakes but insisted that competing for cutting-edge AI capabilities did not violate its safety mission, stating that the company adheres to a race-to-the-top approach, believing that only by staying at the forefront of technology can it drive the industry to raise safety standards. He listed nine safety decisions that had cost the company commercially, including restricting the Mythos-level model's open access for months and strictly limiting biology-related requests. The safety roadmap updated by the company on October 19 states that existing policies mainly target the deployment of dangerous models, and in the future, it may be necessary to directly limit the speed of R&D, with plans to propose relevant policy options by January 15, 2027, or explain why none were proposed.

Ultraman introduced three paths for employees to develop safe super AI

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman introduced three proposals for the safe development of super AI to employees last week. The first is to establish a global regulatory organization similar to the International Atomic Energy Agency, to inspect advanced models and audit safety measures. Insiders say Altman leans towards this route.The second proposal emulates the European Organization for Nuclear Research, merging major AI laboratories into one organization or collaborating through a unified agency for joint development, rather than continuing to race against each other. The third and most extreme, which he referred to as the "Eliezer Plan": an AI company achieves recursive self-improvement first, and then uses overwhelming economic power to control computing power, making it impossible for other developers to catch up. Altman described this idea as "melting down all other companies' GPUs," while stating that this plan is very bad and is only meant to illustrate the extreme possibility.The idea of "melting down GPUs" comes from AI safety researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky. He proposed a thought experiment in 2021, suggesting that super AI could create self-replicating nanomachines to melt down global GPUs, stating that this is merely an extreme example to illustrate the intensity of intervention, not a proposal to be executed. OpenAI proposed the establishment of an "AI version of the International Atomic Energy Agency" in 2023, and Google DeepMind head Hassabis has also advocated for the creation of an "AI version of CERN." Currently, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic plan to establish a joint safety standards organization by the end of this year or early next year, but there are disagreements over the responsibility for model safety testing. Altman hopes to set speed limits for AI development while stating that OpenAI cannot currently cede its competitive advantage to rivals.

first_img Jensen Huang: The U.S. and China should strengthen dialogue on artificial intelligence and jointly promote safe development

NVIDIA's CEO Jensen Huang told CNBC that the company must collaborate with Chinese artificial intelligence companies to monitor related risks. In a media briefing in London on Wednesday evening, he stated that both parties should work together to safely advance technological development. Huang mentioned that artificial intelligence poses potential dangers and indicated that he maintains ongoing dialogue with many researchers in China.Huang believes that the way to collaborate with Chinese artificial intelligence companies is through dialogue and emphasized the need to strengthen this dialogue. He stated that the United States should do this and also advocated for the United Kingdom to take the same approach. The page noted that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei advocate for increased regulation, while Huang has become a prominent voice opposing this stance. In recent months, researchers from laboratories including OpenAI and Anthropic have called for a slowdown in technological development and warned of risks to human survival.The page also mentioned that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed U.S.-China artificial intelligence dialogue with Chinese counterpart He Lifeng in September, covering communication channels for events up to the national security level. The Chinese side reported that Xi Jinping pointed out that there may be competition between China and the U.S. in artificial intelligence, but the space for cooperation may be larger, and both sides can continue to exchange views on risks and benefits to jointly prevent abuse. Huang stated that the UK, with its intellectual capital, is well-positioned to become the convener of relevant dialogue. The related market data showed that NVIDIA's stock price fell by $3.95, a decrease of 1.78%.

first_img OpenAI: Safety justification should be submitted before cutting-edge reinforcement learning training

On September 28, 2026, OpenAI published a safety-related article, stating that before continuing any cutting-edge reinforcement learning training, structured safety documentation should be required. Ideally, such documentation should reach the evidence-based structured risk argument level used in safety-critical industries like aviation and nuclear power. OpenAI views this as a direction for effort while acknowledging the complexity arising from the emergence of AI capabilities, making it difficult to achieve the same level of rigor.The article focuses on cutting-edge reinforcement learning training and does not cover the broader alignment attributes required for internal and external deployments. The recommendations in the article reflect current practices, which are expected to continue evolving and are being implemented internally at OpenAI. Technical safeguards should cover model alignment, isolation, and monitoring, including avoiding speculative positive reinforcement rewards, offline alignment assessments and stress testing, preventing automated scorers from seeing thought chains, as well as multi-layer infrastructure security, sandbox red teaming, limiting high-bandwidth cross-sample communication, and immutable preservation of agent records.Operational guidelines include preemptive dissent across teams, approvals that can be vetoed by senior leadership, accountability of training leads for safety arguments and incident responses, as well as fail-safe pauses, internal oversight, audit access, and escalation by severity. In response to serious misalignment events, OpenAI proposes controlled access to original records, root cause analysis, operational and cultural reviews, and treating incident-derived assessments as regression tests; results of investigations should be made public, along with reviews and operational changes, and affected third parties should be notified as soon as possible.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.