wallet

According to Whale Alert monitoring, 7,499 BTC were transferred from Binance SAFU to an unknown wallet, worth approximately 581 million USD.

The founder of Flap posted on platform X to explain the impact of the official website domain anomaly event.He stated that the risk only involves users who accessed the abnormal website and connected their wallets or signed authorizations within a few minutes before the announcement was made. Users who had previously connected to the FLAP official website normally are not affected by this event and do not need to change their wallet addresses.The founder of Flap also emphasized that FLAP does not store users' private keys, mnemonic phrases, or wallet data; this information will not be saved in the FLAP backend. Until the issue is resolved, users should temporarily avoid accessing the official website, and once the site is restored, the team will issue a notification through the official account.For users who have just connected their wallets on the abnormal website, the founder of Flap stated that they can contact him for assistance via private message.

World Liberty consultant Ogle posted on platform X that it received a warning from the security company Blockaid, advising users to temporarily avoid visiting related websites or connecting wallets.According to the publicly available warning information, Blockaid stated that it has detected an active front-end attack related to the StepDrainer toolkit, involving Kintsu, Flap, and StonkBrokers. The affected sites have been injected with malicious scripts, and users clicking "connect wallet" may be redirected to a malicious asset theft page.Currently, Blockaid is investigating and gathering more information, and further updates will be announced later.

Flap posted on platform X that its official website is currently experiencing DNS hijacking and is being redirected to an unauthorized website.The team reminds users not to visit the official website, connect wallets, or sign any transactions, and stated that they are addressing the issue. An update will be released once the website's safety is confirmed.

According to The Defiant, developer nicolashw submitted a draft Ethereum Improvement Proposal on October 30, which aims to allow external accounts (EOA) to permanently disable the delegation feature of EIP-7702 while retaining the original address, regular transfer, and contract call capabilities.This operation is irreversible and, unlike simply clearing the current delegation, can prevent the account from authorizing smart contract code to run on its behalf in the future. However, it cannot prevent the transfer of funds after a private key leak, nor will it revoke existing token authorizations, and it may also affect account recovery and asset access that rely on the delegation feature.Currently, the draft has not been merged and has not received an official EIP number; if adopted later, it will still need to be activated through an Ethereum network upgrade.

Whale Alert monitoring shows that 750 BTC were transferred from an unknown wallet to Bitfinex, valued at approximately 57.51 million USD. The address attribution is based on the institution's label, and the purpose of the funds has not been disclosed.

Whale Alert monitoring shows that approximately 262 million USDC was transferred from an unknown wallet to Coinbase, worth about 262 million dollars, and the identity of the sender has not yet been confirmed.

According to Whale Alert monitoring, at 02:31 Beijing time, 1,301 BTC were transferred from Coinbase Institutional to an unknown wallet, worth approximately 100.22 million USD.

According to Whale Alert monitoring, at 03:04 Beijing time, 700 BTC were transferred from an unknown wallet to a wallet marked as PayPal, worth approximately 53.65 million USD.

Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett posted that in response to questions about why Binance still claims user funds are safe after a $6 billion hack, a Binance spokesperson stated that customer funds were unaffected and that the funds that were transferred out came from one of the exchange's own hot wallets. Binance claims that most customer funds are stored in cold wallets and are only transferred to hot wallets when users withdraw.The spokesperson stated that most of Binance's daily operating income is held in the form of crypto assets, and the company retains a significant portion of this, reinvesting it into business and security development, as they believe in the long-term value of crypto assets and the industry.He stated, "This is precisely why we are able to immediately absorb such a large loss with our own funds."

According to Lookonchain monitoring, a newly created wallet withdrew 68,773 SOL from Kraken, Bybit, and OKX, worth approximately 6.65 million dollars.

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, BlackRock transferred 37,470 ETH from its ETF wallet to Coinbase Prime, worth approximately 83.3 million USD.

The CEO of the Japanese Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet, Simon Gerovich, tweeted that he supports Binance and all the personnel working overtime on this matter. As a member of the industry, moments like this require unity.Simon Gerovich stated that Bitcoin itself has not been affected, and the network has been operating as designed since 2009. All Bitcoin held by Metaplanet is stored in cold wallets and safeguarded by top-tier regulated custodians.

The founder of hardware wallet company OneKey, Yishi, stated that the security incidents involving Binance and previously Bybit indicate that even if wallet private keys are not leaked, attackers may still steal assets by infiltrating the signature approval system. BlackRock's Bitcoin spot ETF IBIT holds approximately 815,000 BTC, valued at about $63 billion, and is currently primarily custodied by Coinbase.Although IBIT has introduced Anchorage Digital as an additional custodian, there are no plans for asset transfers at this time. Yishi pointed out that BlackRock has not separately purchased insurance for the Bitcoin held by IBIT, and Coinbase's commercial crime insurance coverage is $320 million, shared among multiple clients. The custody agreement stipulates that the liability limit for each cold storage address is $100 million. In the event of a significant theft where assets cannot be recovered or adequate compensation obtained, losses may be borne by ETF holders. There is currently no evidence to suggest that IBIT has become a target of attack.

According to Bitcoin News monitoring, hackers split Bitcoin into 19 wallets, with 17 addresses each receiving 1000 BTC, another address receiving 832.5 BTC, and the last address receiving 437.7 BTC.At the latest check, the 19 wallets still hold the entire balance, and each subsequent transaction can be tracked on-chain.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, despite the market decline, whales continue to buy BTC.In the past 4 hours, 9 newly created wallets received a total of 1900 BTC from Galaxy Digital, valued at approximately 148 million dollars based on the price at that time.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, after the Binance attacker completed the sale of all 217.5 million ENA (worth 33.93 million USD), another trader began to go long on ENA.A newly created wallet address (0xedc0) deposited 2 million USDC into Hyperliquid and opened a long position of 22.78 million ENA with 3x leverage, worth approximately 4.09 million USD.

Arbitrum officials stated that the Arbitrum Security Committee has taken emergency action to transfer 74,559,805 ARB and 8,425 ETH held at addresses related to the Binance attack incident on Arbitrum One. After technical assessment and review, the Security Committee transferred the funds to an intermediate frozen wallet using a specific technical solution, which did not affect the status of other users and applications on the Arbitrum network.As of October 30, 2026, the aforementioned funds have been successfully transferred and are no longer under the control of the original holding addresses. Subsequent actions can only be taken through further actions by the Arbitrum Security Committee or governance votes by the Arbitrum DAO, and relevant actions will be coordinated with all parties involved.

The founder of Slow Fog, Yu Xian, tweeted that the Binance hacker chose the EIP-7702 mechanism on Ethereum solely for the convenience of the cleanup work, which is to bulk steal tokens from Binance-related hot wallets.Yu Xian stated that, from an on-chain perspective, the hacker's operations were relatively crude, and they conducted several hours of rehearsal preparation before the actual theft. He emphasized that there is nothing wrong with the EIP-7702 mechanism itself; even without this protocol mechanism, there are other ways to achieve similar operations.