BTC $79,370.53 +1.35%
ETH $2,500.15 +1.02%
BNB $749.99 -0.07%
XRP $1.43 +2.71%
SOL $104.39 +1.46%
TRX $0.3390 +0.11%
DOGE $0.0909 +2.15%
ADA $0.2204 +1.33%
BCH $258.98 +1.43%
LINK $12.18 -2.77%
HYPE $86.73 +4.43%
AAVE $129.10 +0.24%
SUI $0.8137 +0.48%
XLM $0.1886 +0.79%
ZEC $1,264.58 +9.01%
BTC $79,370.53 +1.35%
ETH $2,500.15 +1.02%
BNB $749.99 -0.07%
XRP $1.43 +2.71%
SOL $104.39 +1.46%
TRX $0.3390 +0.11%
DOGE $0.0909 +2.15%
ADA $0.2204 +1.33%
BCH $258.98 +1.43%
LINK $12.18 -2.77%
HYPE $86.73 +4.43%
AAVE $129.10 +0.24%
SUI $0.8137 +0.48%
XLM $0.1886 +0.79%
ZEC $1,264.58 +9.01%

neutral

All
Article
Flash

first_img The National Sheriffs' Association will change its stance on the Clarity Act from opposition to neutrality

According to CoinDesk, the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) sent a letter to Senate leadership on Thursday, announcing a shift in its position on the Clarity Act from opposition to neutrality. Association President Troy Wellman and Executive Director Justin Smith stated in their letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that, given the complexity of the bill and the significant details still under review, the most appropriate course of action is to take a step back and allow the legislative process to continue in order to establish a clear, effective, and urgently needed regulatory framework.Previously, the NSA had sent a letter to the Senate Banking Committee in May, warning that Section 604 of the bill would grant "blanket exemptions" to mixers, tumblers, and DeFi platforms from anti-money laundering rules, and stated that individuals might exploit evolving software, algorithms, and AI agents to transfer digital assets without tracking or accountability, engaging in activities such as money laundering, financing terrorism, and evading sanctions. A month after that letter was sent, the White House invited law enforcement organizations expressing concerns about the cryptocurrency market structure bill to meet and discuss how to address the bill's controversies regarding the prevention of illegal finance. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger also criticized the NSA's opposition stance in a July column, calling the bill "the most significant consumer protection measure in years."The NSA's shift to neutrality removes one of the most outspoken critics from the law enforcement community ahead of the September vote on the bill.

Goldman Sachs raises CoreWeave's target price to $139, maintaining a neutral rating

According to a Goldman Sachs report on August 20, CoreWeave's Q2 revenue met expectations, with an EBIT margin exceeding market consensus by 200 basis points, and the 2026 revenue guidance surpassing market expectations by 1%. Revenue backlog increased by 5% quarter-over-quarter to $104 billion, with over $25 billion in new committed orders since Q3. Active power installations rose from 1GW in Q1 to over 1.5GW, with contracted power installations reaching 4.2GW. Goldman Sachs raised the 12-month target price from $121 to $139, indicating a 53% upside from the current stock price, maintaining a neutral rating.Goldman Sachs believes that CoreWeave's short-term certainty is clear: demand continues to outpace supply, pricing for new and old GPU generations remains high, and capacity is expanding as expected. The new generation of chips (Blackwell, Vera Rubin) is continuously setting new price highs, and recent A100 contract deliveries have been extended to 2029. The proportion of enterprise customers is increasing (Caterpillar, IBM, Nissan, ZF), and AI computing power demand is spreading from tech giants to the real economy. Goldman Sachs expects EBITDA to grow from $3.1 billion in 2025 to $31.3 billion in 2028. The neutral rating reflects a wait-and-see approach until software and platform services become more certain contributors to profit margins before making a more positive judgment.

Forbes: Bitcoin may solve the Triffin dilemma of the dollar and become a global neutral reserve asset

An article in Forbes states that U.S. Vice President JD Vance's previous views on the global reserve status of the dollar have sparked discussions about the long-term contradictions of the dollar system. The article argues that while the dollar, as a global reserve currency, brings financing advantages, it also creates the "Triffin Dilemma": a national currency struggles to simultaneously meet domestic economic needs and global reserve demands.The article points out that the dollar's reserve status drives global capital inflows into the U.S., enhancing the dollar's value, allowing American consumers to access cheap imported goods, but simultaneously weakening the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing and exacerbating trade deficits. The author believes that after the end of the Bretton Woods system and the suspension of gold convertibility in 1971, the dollar system continued to operate through U.S. Treasury bonds and the global dollar market, but the core contradictions have not disappeared. Stablecoins, while able to expand the use of the dollar, still rely on U.S. government debt and cannot completely resolve the issue of reserve assets depending on a single country's liabilities.The article states that while gold has non-sovereign attributes, it faces limitations in transportation, verification, and settlement efficiency. Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, lack of need for state credit endorsement, global verifiability, and rapid digital settlement features, may become a new neutral reserve asset. The author suggests that in the future, the dollar can continue to serve as a global transaction and commercial currency, while Bitcoin may gradually take on more roles as a reserve asset, thereby alleviating the global monetary system's dependence on a single country's liabilities. However, the article also notes that Bitcoin currently faces issues such as price volatility, limited institutional adoption, and insufficient maturity of custodial systems. Gold has a financial history spanning hundreds of years, while Bitcoin has only existed for 17 years, and whether it can become a global reserve asset still requires time to verify.

Ethlabs: Existing funds can support 2–3 years of development, adhering to non-profit and neutral governance

Ethlabs published a response on platform X regarding its nonprofit positioning and funding situation, stating that the choice to operate under a nonprofit structure is to focus on the long-term development needs of Ethereum as a "public good" and to maintain the organization's independence and neutrality in research and development.In terms of governance structure, Ethlabs pointed out that its funding comes from large ETH holders and Ethereum ecosystem builders, whose interests are highly aligned with the long-term success of Ethereum, but they will not gain any governance control or participate in roadmap formulation or project prioritization decisions. Ethlabs emphasized that this arrangement is intentionally designed to avoid external funding influencing core directions.At the same time, Ethlabs stated that the future continuous financing mechanism itself is also a form of "accountability mechanism," meaning that only by continuously creating real value for the Ethereum ecosystem can they obtain subsequent funding support, thus forming a long-term feedback loop.Regarding funding, Ethlabs revealed that it is currently in the final stages of financing and has not disclosed specific amounts, but the committed funds already obtained are expected to support an operational cycle of 2 to 3 years and cover the recruitment needs for top talent. Ethlabs emphasized its positioning as a long-term project, not a one-time funding plan.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.