BTC $83,215.37 -1.70%
ETH $2,674.35 -0.38%
BNB $761.29 -2.21%
XRP $1.49 -2.26%
SOL $117.69 -4.11%
TRX $0.3356 +0.60%
DOGE $0.0932 -4.29%
ADA $0.2438 -4.74%
BCH $306.98 -7.79%
LINK $15.15 +7.91%
HYPE $86.81 -5.04%
AAVE $146.10 -5.58%
SUI $1.13 -9.96%
XLM $0.2254 +4.05%
ZEC $1,465.14 -8.44%
AAPL $338.57 -0.46%
AMZN $246.40 -1.37%
GOOGL $342.56 -0.35%
MSFT $509.78 -1.34%
META $717.46 -4.05%
NVDA $228.98 +1.89%
TSLA $357.85 -4.00%
SNDK $1,712.28 -3.53%
INTC $115.85 -6.87%
SPCX $145.88 -2.28%
MU $1,053.31 -3.51%
AMD $608.47 -3.65%
BTC $83,215.37 -1.70%
ETH $2,674.35 -0.38%
BNB $761.29 -2.21%
XRP $1.49 -2.26%
SOL $117.69 -4.11%
TRX $0.3356 +0.60%
DOGE $0.0932 -4.29%
ADA $0.2438 -4.74%
BCH $306.98 -7.79%
LINK $15.15 +7.91%
HYPE $86.81 -5.04%
AAVE $146.10 -5.58%
SUI $1.13 -9.96%
XLM $0.2254 +4.05%
ZEC $1,465.14 -8.44%
AAPL $338.57 -0.46%
AMZN $246.40 -1.37%
GOOGL $342.56 -0.35%
MSFT $509.78 -1.34%
META $717.46 -4.05%
NVDA $228.98 +1.89%
TSLA $357.85 -4.00%
SNDK $1,712.28 -3.53%
INTC $115.85 -6.87%
SPCX $145.88 -2.28%
MU $1,053.31 -3.51%
AMD $608.47 -3.65%

hpc

All
Article
Flash

first_img Hyperliquid's policy center suggests to the SEC and CFTC to classify perpetual equity as securities futures

Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) submitted a letter of opinion to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) stating that eligible equity perpetual contracts can be classified as securities futures. This category is jointly regulated by the two agencies, allowing exchanges to compete on execution quality rather than jurisdiction.HPC pointed out that there is still no clear classification for perpetual contracts under U.S. law (whether futures or swaps), and this fundamental issue remains unresolved. They possess characteristics of futures such as standardized terms, the ability to hedge positions, and forward value, although they do not have a fixed expiration date, but prices converge continuously through funding rates.The letter of opinion proposed four points: confirm that the definition of securities futures can encompass cash-settled equity perpetuals with futures characteristics; retain flexibility for product listings at trading venues; maintain consistency in classification between the two agencies; modernize the securities futures framework to accommodate new structures. HPC stated that in the past 10 months, the trading volume of Hyperliquid perpetual contracts has exceeded $48 billion, and a clear framework would help relevant products enter the U.S. market.

first_img HPC Report: Perpetual contracts are a supplement to futures contracts rather than a replacement, achieving risk transfer at a lower cost

The latest research report from the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) states that perpetual contracts expand hedging options and improve price discovery, with no evidence found of statistically significant harm to the benchmark futures market. The report argues that perpetual contracts are complementary to traditional futures with expiration dates, rather than zero-sum substitutes.The study utilizes the natural experiment of traditional markets being closed on weekends while perpetual markets continue trading, comparing 205 weekends of Bitcoin trading and 19 weekends of on-chain crude oil perpetual (xyz:CL) samples. The report states that expiring futures require calendar-based forced rollovers, with the cost of rolling a $10 million exposure on the Monday of April 2026 being about $950,000, while on Friday it is about $110,000; perpetual positions do not have this forced cost. The median transaction price for on-chain crude oil perpetual during non-trading hours is about $1,300, approximately one percent of the benchmark WTI median transaction price.HPC also provides an example where the crude oil weekend repricing on the week of March 6, 2026, was 15.8%, with the benchmark market completely closed; if hedged through on-chain crude oil perpetual, a $10 million position loss could be reduced from about $1.58 million to approximately $62,000 (after accounting for all costs).

TeraWulf's Q1 HPC revenue surpasses Bitcoin mining for the first time, as the trend of transitioning computing power to AI infrastructure accelerates

Bitcoin mining company TeraWulf announced its Q1 financial report, showing that its high-performance computing (HPC) business has for the first time surpassed Bitcoin mining revenue, marking a critical stage in the company's transformation towards AI and cloud computing infrastructure.The company's total revenue for Q1 was $34 million, roughly flat compared to the same period last year. Among this, HPC leasing revenue reached $21 million, surpassing the less than $13 million from digital asset mining for the first time, becoming the main source of income. The financial report also indicated that the company's net loss widened to $427.6 million, mainly due to the impact of non-cash warrant revaluation. However, CFO Patrick Fleury emphasized that the company is transitioning from "volatile mining revenue" to "stable long-term computing power contract revenue." Currently, TeraWulf has 60 MW of HPC capacity generating revenue at its Lake Mariner data center in New York and plans to continue expanding within the year. At the same time, the company is transforming part of its mining infrastructure into AI/HPC computing resources to support massive computing power demands. This trend is spreading throughout the industry, with Bitcoin mining companies like Riot Platforms also expanding their revenue structure through data centers and AI contracts, gradually transforming into "computing power infrastructure companies."

Bitcoin mining companies are facing the choice of expanding market share or fully investing in AI

According to ChainCatcher news, as reported by CoinDesk, Bitcoin mining companies are at a critical crossroads: they can choose to pivot towards artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC) to boost their stock prices, or they can stick to their core Bitcoin mining business and expand their market share while facing sluggish stock prices.In September, the largest market cap mining companies, MARA Holdings (MARA), Riot Platforms (RIOT), and CleanSpark (CLSK), all increased their share of the total Bitcoin mined. These companies have stronger balance sheets and larger mining operations, which help them cope with the decline in profitability following the Bitcoin halving in April. However, investors have not rewarded these companies' stocks with a premium, and their performance remained lackluster in September.In contrast, mining companies focusing on AI and HPC, such as Core Scientific (CORZ), TerraWulf (WULF), and IREN (IREN), have seen their stock prices outperform Bitcoin. The halving in April reduced Bitcoin mining rewards by 50%, intensifying competition in mining and narrowing profit margins.Additionally, the recently approved spot Bitcoin ETF in the U.S. has also diminished investors' interest in mining stocks. Instead, investors are rewarding those mining companies that utilize part of their data centers to host AI and HPC-related machines for revenue diversification.AI and HPC computing require a significant amount of electricity, and Bitcoin miners have already secured these resources, making them ideal candidates for rapidly expanding AI and HPC companies. In September, the stock prices of large-cap mining companies rose by 4% to 9%, while those associated with AI and HPC saw price increases of up to 25%.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.