Scan to download
BTC $75,052.78 +0.47%
ETH $2,334.16 -0.29%
BNB $627.20 +0.73%
XRP $1.44 +2.32%
SOL $88.09 +3.34%
TRX $0.3253 -0.17%
DOGE $0.0980 +1.62%
ADA $0.2560 +2.44%
BCH $449.43 +1.87%
LINK $9.46 +1.62%
HYPE $43.89 -3.02%
AAVE $113.17 +6.49%
SUI $0.9924 +2.26%
XLM $0.1669 +3.78%
ZEC $334.84 -1.94%
BTC $75,052.78 +0.47%
ETH $2,334.16 -0.29%
BNB $627.20 +0.73%
XRP $1.44 +2.32%
SOL $88.09 +3.34%
TRX $0.3253 -0.17%
DOGE $0.0980 +1.62%
ADA $0.2560 +2.44%
BCH $449.43 +1.87%
LINK $9.46 +1.62%
HYPE $43.89 -3.02%
AAVE $113.17 +6.49%
SUI $0.9924 +2.26%
XLM $0.1669 +3.78%
ZEC $334.84 -1.94%

oppose

The U.S. prosecution opposes adopting the opinion letter from the DeFi Education Fund, and the Ethereum MEV case may be re-examined

The U.S. prosecution has submitted a letter to the Southern District of New York Federal Court opposing the court's acceptance of the amicus brief submitted by the digital asset advocacy organization DeFi Education Fund while considering whether to re-examine a case related to Ethereum MEV.U.S. Acting Attorney Jay Clayton stated in a document addressed to Judge Jessica Clarke that the brief "is detached from the trial record and merely reiterates legal arguments previously rejected by the court," and should not be accepted. The case involves brothers Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, who are accused of exploiting approximately $25 million through automated MEV bots on Ethereum. In November, the court declared a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on guilt or innocence. Subsequently, the U.S. government requested the court to schedule a retrial as soon as possible in late February or early March 2026.According to the draft brief submitted by DEF on December 19, the organization supports the dismissal of the case or a not guilty verdict, arguing that such prosecutions create uncertainty and fear for DeFi developers, potentially stifling industry innovation and driving participants away. The prosecution, however, contends that these views do not provide new legal grounds. The direction of the case remains unclear. If the brothers are found guilty of the same charges in the retrial, they could face up to 20 years in prison for each count. The outcome of the case is also seen within the industry as having significant implications for MEV behavior and the related compliance boundaries.

Executives in the cryptocurrency industry oppose California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax legislation

The proposed "Billionaire Tax Bill" in California has sparked strong opposition from several figures in the cryptocurrency industry. The proposal aims to impose a 5% wealth tax on individuals with a net worth exceeding $1 billion, to fund the healthcare system and state aid programs. Industry insiders believe that this policy could lead to an outflow of entrepreneurs and capital, negatively impacting the local innovation ecosystem.Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley and Kraken co-founder Jesse Powell pointed out that the wealth tax is partially based on unrealized gains, which may force taxpayers to sell shares or business assets to raise funds. Powell stated on the X platform that this measure could become the "last straw" that drives billionaires out of California, with related spending, jobs, and charitable activities potentially shifting elsewhere.Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures, and Jeff Park, Chief Investment Officer of ProCap BTC, also believe that in a context of highly mobile capital, a one-time wealth tax could signal the market for future further taxation. Meanwhile, Fredrik Haga, co-founder of Dune, cited Norway as an example, stating that similar tax systems have led to the migration of high-net-worth individuals, with actual tax revenue outcomes falling short of expectations.Supporters of the proposal include Ro Khanna, a representative from California's 17th congressional district, who believes that the tax revenue will be used to improve childcare, housing, and educational conditions, thereby benefiting innovation in the U.S. However, opponents have pointed out that California's audit reports have revealed issues with the efficiency of public fund usage, questioning whether the new tax revenue can truly be used for its intended purposes.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.