BTC $79,840.27 +1.26%
ETH $2,490.54 -0.11%
BNB $708.57 +0.79%
XRP $1.42 +1.12%
SOL $106.48 +5.16%
TRX $0.3385 +1.24%
DOGE $0.0877 +0.94%
ADA $0.2101 +0.07%
BCH $264.17 -0.88%
LINK $11.74 +1.60%
HYPE $83.05 +2.55%
AAVE $126.38 +0.84%
SUI $0.7608 +1.38%
XLM $0.1845 +0.64%
ZEC $790.82 +1.24%
BTC $79,840.27 +1.26%
ETH $2,490.54 -0.11%
BNB $708.57 +0.79%
XRP $1.42 +1.12%
SOL $106.48 +5.16%
TRX $0.3385 +1.24%
DOGE $0.0877 +0.94%
ADA $0.2101 +0.07%
BCH $264.17 -0.88%
LINK $11.74 +1.60%
HYPE $83.05 +2.55%
AAVE $126.38 +0.84%
SUI $0.7608 +1.38%
XLM $0.1845 +0.64%
ZEC $790.82 +1.24%

outcomes

All
Article
Flash

first_img Viewpoint: The AI application layer should not be priced based on tokens, but should be anchored to "recognizable work value."

a16z partner Sarah Wang recently published an article pointing out that AI application layer products should not price based on tokens like the model layer, but rather on "recognizable work units." The article argues that token pricing anchors the value of application products to a unit whose cost is continuously declining, making it difficult for customers to predict context length, retrieval volume, or reasoning time, and improperly compares applications to raw computing power.The article suggests a tiered pricing model based on value levels: model layer priced by tokens; application layer priced by recognizable work units for customers (such as account research briefs, code modifications, completed queries), which can be encapsulated through Credits; and scenarios that are attributable and have clear value priced directly by results (such as resolved customer service conversations, qualified leads). The design of Credits should map to different levels of work difficulty to protect gross margins and distinguish "work value" from "delivery cost." The article uses Clay as an example, where its new pricing separates Data Credits (third-party data) from Actions (orchestrated work), only passing on costs for reasoning models with significant cost fluctuations without markup. The author believes that pricing anchored to value rather than computing cost allows customers to understand spending in relation to value, while also benefiting product providers in maintaining profit margins.

The U.S. SEC has postponed the review of the first batch of prediction market ETFs, which are linked to real events such as election outcomes and economic recessions

According to Reuters, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed the review of the first batch of predictive market ETFs, resulting in the postponement of more than 24 products originally scheduled for launch. Insiders revealed that the SEC is requesting issuers to provide further clarification on product mechanisms and information disclosure details, and this delay is expected to be temporary.Issuers such as Roundhill Investments, Bitwise Asset Management, and GraniteShares submitted applications in February this year to launch ETF products linked to real-world events such as election results, economic recessions, tech layoffs, and oil prices.According to SEC rules, ETF applications typically become effective automatically 75 days after submission unless the regulatory agency intervenes. Currently, Roundhill has set May 5 as the effective date, and Bitwise and GraniteShares' products are also expected to launch around the same time. The market is closely watching whether the SEC will ultimately approve these products that open up the "event contract" asset class.Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan stated, "This is a rapidly maturing field, and regulation is maturing in parallel," noting that innovative products like Bitcoin ETFs have also gone through a lengthy review process but ultimately launched successfully.

Tom Lee: The net effect of the war on the U.S. economy is positive, and the market has begun to price in favorable outcomes

Tom Lee, chairman of BitMine, a company in the Ethereum treasury, stated in an interview with CNBC, "The reason the stock market remains resilient is that even in the face of war, the economy is actually performing better than expected." He pointed out that defense spending is currently about $30 billion per month and could rise to $60 billion per month in the future, which has a significant stimulating effect on the economy; meanwhile, the rise in oil prices by $20 per month only adds about $12 billion in burden to households, "Overall, the war is actually helping corporate profits right now."Tom Lee cited historical precedents, saying, "Looking back at World War II, the stock market bottomed out in May 1942, just five months after the U.S. entered the war, and at that time, no American troops had even set foot on the European or Pacific battlefields." He believes, "The market is very good at pricing in outcomes ahead of time; the current rise in the stock market means that the market is pricing in a favorable outcome, although I can't clearly articulate the specific reasons, but that's the signal conveyed by the market's performance."Regarding the three major variables in the current market— the Iran war, corporate earnings reports, and interest rates—Tom Lee stated, "Among the three, only war can create tail events in both directions, so this is the variable that deserves the closest attention." In terms of sector allocation, he remains bullish on the energy sector and pointed out that energy security is one of the most important structural themes in recent years.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.