BTC $59,779.34 +2.49%
ETH $1,602.91 +2.31%
BNB $547.89 +0.36%
XRP $1.04 +1.31%
SOL $77.17 +5.17%
TRX $0.3156 +0.36%
DOGE $0.0720 +0.47%
ADA $0.1532 +6.70%
BCH $210.73 +5.72%
LINK $7.33 +2.15%
HYPE $62.40 -2.88%
AAVE $82.92 -3.72%
SUI $0.7134 +3.44%
XLM $0.1946 +1.85%
ZEC $412.34 +4.10%
BTC $59,779.34 +2.49%
ETH $1,602.91 +2.31%
BNB $547.89 +0.36%
XRP $1.04 +1.31%
SOL $77.17 +5.17%
TRX $0.3156 +0.36%
DOGE $0.0720 +0.47%
ADA $0.1532 +6.70%
BCH $210.73 +5.72%
LINK $7.33 +2.15%
HYPE $62.40 -2.88%
AAVE $82.92 -3.72%
SUI $0.7134 +3.44%
XLM $0.1946 +1.85%
ZEC $412.34 +4.10%

request

All
Article
Flash

first_img CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

DeFi community jointly writes to the SEC requesting the establishment of rules to clarify the regulatory framework

The DeFi Education Fund, along with Aave Labs, Uniswap Labs, Paradigm, Andreessen Horowitz, and other organizations, has sent a letter to the U.S. SEC in response to the recent statement released by the trading and markets division regarding the registration of "non-custodial user interface" brokers for crypto asset securities.The signatories support the statement that the "non-custodial user interface," which only provides a technical entry point and allows users to manage their assets independently, should be excluded from broker registration. They also urge the SEC to establish clearer and more sustainable definitions of "broker" through formal rulemaking, to avoid incorrectly categorizing neutral software tool providers, validators, RPC/API, oracles, cloud services, and other infrastructure under broker regulations. This would provide long-term legal certainty for blockchain infrastructure innovation while ensuring investor protection.Previously, the SEC's trading and markets division indicated that some DeFi trading interfaces do not need to register as brokers, allowing for policy space for related applications. Supporters believe that the new regulations could cover infrastructure participants such as validators, APIs, and oracles. Currently, the U.S. crypto market legislation, the CLARITY Act, is stalled in the Senate.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.