BTC $80,066.30 -1.03%
ETH $2,322.33 -0.99%
BNB $739.23 -2.30%
XRP $1.29 -2.10%
SOL $100.20 -1.72%
TRX $0.3311 -0.10%
DOGE $0.0786 -1.22%
ADA $0.2001 -2.19%
BCH $278.58 -5.90%
LINK $11.59 -0.48%
HYPE $88.45 +9.44%
AAVE $132.86 -0.29%
SUI $0.9175 -1.18%
XLM $0.1697 -0.35%
ZEC $1,270.39 -1.95%
AAPL $348.50 +0.56%
AMZN $250.29 -1.30%
GOOGL $288.27 -11.29%
MSFT $537.50 +1.16%
META $619.07 -0.55%
NVDA $214.47 -2.53%
TSLA $403.28 -1.78%
SNDK $1,365.55 +0.30%
INTC $92.53 -2.99%
SPCX $143.26 -4.04%
MU $955.70 -0.73%
AMD $565.79 -0.54%
BTC $80,066.30 -1.03%
ETH $2,322.33 -0.99%
BNB $739.23 -2.30%
XRP $1.29 -2.10%
SOL $100.20 -1.72%
TRX $0.3311 -0.10%
DOGE $0.0786 -1.22%
ADA $0.2001 -2.19%
BCH $278.58 -5.90%
LINK $11.59 -0.48%
HYPE $88.45 +9.44%
AAVE $132.86 -0.29%
SUI $0.9175 -1.18%
XLM $0.1697 -0.35%
ZEC $1,270.39 -1.95%
AAPL $348.50 +0.56%
AMZN $250.29 -1.30%
GOOGL $288.27 -11.29%
MSFT $537.50 +1.16%
META $619.07 -0.55%
NVDA $214.47 -2.53%
TSLA $403.28 -1.78%
SNDK $1,365.55 +0.30%
INTC $92.53 -2.99%
SPCX $143.26 -4.04%
MU $955.70 -0.73%
AMD $565.79 -0.54%

rif

All
Article
Flash

The SEC's conditions for tokenized securities exemptions have sparked disagreements, with the industry calling for clarification on the "public and permissionless" standard

The innovation exemption for tokenized securities trading venues launched by the U.S. SEC in September is sparking controversy within the industry regarding blockchain qualification standards. This exemption allows eligible companies to trade tokenized U.S. stocks without registering as traditional securities exchanges, but requires their smart contracts to be auditable, public, and deployed on a public, permissionless blockchain.Currently, three companies have submitted operational intent notices to the SEC. TSV LLC plans to use the privacy-focused Canton Network; OKXICE and Kephas Corp. intend to utilize their respective enterprise group's developed Ethereum Layer 2 networks.In a letter submitted on Thursday, the Solana Policy Institute requested the SEC to tighten the definition of "permissionless," focusing on who actually controls the blockchain, including who can validate or block transactions and modify network rules. Hedera advocates for an expansion of the exemption's scope, arguing that only authorized entities should participate in validation, which should not disqualify their network.The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) also called for clarification on which blockchains are eligible and questioned whether stock tokenization should require explicit prior consent from the issuing company, rather than requiring companies to opt out. The financial regulatory advocacy group Better Markets urged the SEC to withdraw the exemption and instead engage in formal rulemaking.An SEC official stated that companies can begin operations 30 days after submitting a notice, provided they meet the exemption criteria, without waiting for SEC approval, which does not imply SEC endorsement of their chosen blockchain. The official noted that the regulatory agency intends to maintain a broad definition to allow space for companies to experiment; further frequently asked questions may be released, but substantive adjustments would require action from the commission.Meanwhile, more companies are opposing the tokenization of their stocks. As of Friday, among the 62 companies initially listed by OKXICE, 22 have raised objections, exceeding one-third. New objectors include Wells Fargo, Arm, and Intuit.

first_img Anthropic: Claude has completed large-scale formal verification of the open-source library

On October 22, the Frontier Red Team of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic released research stating that large language models can automatically write formal proofs on a larger scale. The team collaborated with Theorem to use Claude to prove safety properties on over 100 real open-source libraries at the RISC-V assembly level, claiming this is the first known instance of using AI for large-scale formal verification of production software at the assembly level. During the proof-writing process, vulnerabilities that had gone undetected for years were also discovered.The experiment converted existing compilable fuzz tests from Google OSS-Fuzz into specifications: under assumptions of single-threaded static binaries, fixed memory budgets, RISC-V CPUs, and Linux, for any input less than 64 MB, the program should exit normally without triggering memory safety errors or assertion failures. Within weeks, Claude proved the aforementioned properties for 239 entry points in 123 OSS-Fuzz libraries after patching the identified issues. The proofs targeted compiled RISC-V instructions, approximately 180 million lines of Rocq, and were checked by the Rocq kernel. The page states that this does not mean these libraries are free of vulnerabilities, as remaining issues may lie outside trusted components or the scope of the proofs.The page also mentions that the team had Claude formalize RFC 1950 and proved that the zlib implementation in the Linux kernel conforms to that specification at the x86 binary level; an interpreter written in Rust covering a large subset of Python showed a 99.95% consistency with CPython behavior across over 1.7 million randomly generated programs. In 36 small verification tasks, Opus 5.5 proved that about half required approximately 40% fewer tokens than Opus 5. The team also pointed out that the proofs targeted single-threaded, statically linked RISC-V binaries, and the proof checker cannot determine whether the specifications align with reality.

first_img FCA releases draft guidelines for DeFi, clarifying when interfaces need to obtain authorization in the UK

On October 21, the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published Consultation Paper 26/36 titled "Guidance on the Regulatory Scope of Cryptoassets," which explains how to determine whether related activities require authorization when the business model involves a certain degree of decentralization.The FCA pointed out that the use of software, smart contracts, distributed ledger technology, distributed governance mechanisms, or other technological arrangements does not, by itself, determine whether there are regulated activities that require authorization. Automation merely describes the manner in which functions are executed and does not determine whether that function constitutes part of a regulated activity. The so-called "true DeFi" is not a statutory concept in the "Regulated Activities Order" or the "Cryptoasset Regulations"; the degree of decentralization is a continuum and does not constitute an independent or separate regulatory framework.At the same time, the FCA also published Guidance Consultation Paper 26/7, which explains how regulated firms should manage DeFi risks, focusing on operational resilience and financial crime risks, and provides examples of measures that firms may consider taking. Both consultation papers will close for comments on November 18, and the FCA plans to publish the final guidance in January 2027. Starting from October 25, 2027, the new regulations will bring new cryptoasset activities under regulatory oversight, and firms wishing to continue related business must submit authorization applications by February 28, 2027.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.