BTC $80,388.14 -1.14%
ETH $2,335.80 -2.54%
BNB $728.37 -1.96%
XRP $1.29 -1.58%
SOL $101.22 -2.71%
TRX $0.3291 -0.21%
DOGE $0.0770 -2.86%
ADA $0.2065 -3.62%
BCH $274.20 -3.73%
LINK $11.54 -3.53%
HYPE $76.25 -1.85%
AAVE $136.97 -6.86%
SUI $0.9356 -4.70%
XLM $0.1704 -2.86%
ZEC $1,188.46 -3.49%
AAPL $346.88 -0.08%
AMZN $247.63 -0.49%
GOOGL $320.56 -0.52%
MSFT $523.25 -0.25%
META $641.04 -0.83%
NVDA $211.79 -0.03%
TSLA $371.53 -0.18%
SNDK $1,232.56 -1.14%
INTC $86.94 +0.38%
SPCX $146.85 +0.40%
MU $883.56 +0.84%
AMD $519.50 +0.45%
BTC $80,388.14 -1.14%
ETH $2,335.80 -2.54%
BNB $728.37 -1.96%
XRP $1.29 -1.58%
SOL $101.22 -2.71%
TRX $0.3291 -0.21%
DOGE $0.0770 -2.86%
ADA $0.2065 -3.62%
BCH $274.20 -3.73%
LINK $11.54 -3.53%
HYPE $76.25 -1.85%
AAVE $136.97 -6.86%
SUI $0.9356 -4.70%
XLM $0.1704 -2.86%
ZEC $1,188.46 -3.49%
AAPL $346.88 -0.08%
AMZN $247.63 -0.49%
GOOGL $320.56 -0.52%
MSFT $523.25 -0.25%
META $641.04 -0.83%
NVDA $211.79 -0.03%
TSLA $371.53 -0.18%
SNDK $1,232.56 -1.14%
INTC $86.94 +0.38%
SPCX $146.85 +0.40%
MU $883.56 +0.84%
AMD $519.50 +0.45%

strict

All
Article
Flash

first_img Over 10,000 complaints have been filed against the UK's banking crypto transfer restrictions, with Lloyds and Barclays being named

According to Cointelegraph, the crypto advocacy organization Stand With Crypto stated that during a 90-day period from May to August 2026, a total of 9,803 individuals submitted 10,092 complaints to UK banks through the organization's online tools, reflecting the restrictions encountered when transferring to crypto platforms.The highest number of complaints came from Lloyds Banking Group, one of the largest banking groups in the UK, totaling 2,297, followed by Barclays with 1,569 and NatWest Group with 1,278. These complaints have raised concerns about the accessibility of crypto services in the UK ahead of the launch of a new regulatory framework for digital assets in 2027.The report shows that UK banks have varying practices regarding restrictions on crypto transfers. Barclays and HSBC UK are listed as limiting crypto transfers to £2,500 (approximately $3,300) per transaction and £10,000 (approximately $13,300) every 30 days. Six banks, including Starling Bank, TSB, and Chase UK, are listed as completely prohibiting transfers related to crypto.Meanwhile, Lloyds Banking Group and Revolut are classified as having not disclosed their restrictions on crypto transfers, despite also receiving customer complaints. Revolut's official support page states that transfers to "certain cryptocurrency exchanges" are not supported, and a spokesperson for Stand With Crypto indicated that this seems to be a technical issue rather than an established policy.Nick Jones, founder and CEO of Zumo, told Cointelegraph that banking restrictions are a common issue faced by crypto founders in the UK, which could undermine the country's ambition to become a global crypto hub. He stated that the issue of limited access to banking services needs urgent resolution so that UK crypto businesses can grow and expand in a fair environment.Jones also warned that the upcoming crypto regulatory framework in the UK may not address this issue. Although businesses are preparing for mandatory approval from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) by October 2027, obtaining business bank accounts is not included in that framework. He added that without coordinated action, businesses may obtain full authorization but still be unable to open UK business bank accounts.

first_img The U.S. OCC released a report on de-banking, listing cryptocurrency activities within the scope of banking restrictions

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released a report on de-banking on Wednesday, pointing out that some banks had established "public and non-public policies" to restrict services to multiple industries, including oil and gas, tobacco, firearms, and digital assets. This report was issued based on an executive order signed by President Trump in August 2025, aimed at preventing what it calls "illegal de-banking" practices.The OCC stated that many institutions also imposed restrictions on digital asset businesses, involving issuers, exchanges, or management agencies, often citing financial crime considerations as justification. However, this 47-page report did not provide specific de-banking cases related to digital asset activities. The OCC noted that based on a review of nine large banks, it "could not fully quantify the overall scale of de-banking or alleged de-banking activities," with the agency's head, Jonathan Gould, primarily discussing claims of de-banking related to coal and firearms.Gould stated that these decisions were not based on financial risk; banks cited concerns about negative news, public protests, and the potential reputational consequences of supporting related industries. In November 2024, more than 30 executives from the technology and cryptocurrency industries claimed they were denied banking services, informally referring to it as "Operation Chokepoint 2." Trump's executive order in 2025 came after industry-related calls, following allegations that the Biden administration might influence financial institutions to cut off certain services to cryptocurrency companies.

South Korea's Financial Services Commission: Restricting Shareholding in Virtual Asset Exchanges to Strengthen Regulatory Responsibility

According to a report by the Korean News Agency, the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, Lee Ik-yeon, stated that the provisions regarding the shareholding restrictions for major shareholders of virtual asset exchanges in the ongoing "Digital Asset Basic Law" are not influenced by specific individuals, but rather consider the need for exchanges to bear higher public responsibilities after institutionalization.Lee Ik-yeon mentioned during the National Assembly's Political Affairs Committee Financial Committee's national governance inspection that currently, South Korean virtual asset exchanges operate under a system of updating declarations every three years. However, after the implementation of the "Digital Asset Basic Law," exchanges will transition to a licensed institutional operation model. He noted that exchanges have infrastructure attributes, thus requiring public nature and responsibility that match their status.Previously, South Korean lawmakers questioned why the original proposal from the Financial Services Commission did not include shareholding restrictions for major shareholders, whether the relevant provisions were influenced by external factors, and pointed out that if enforced, major shareholders and potential acquirers of South Korean exchanges might need to sell shares worth trillions of Korean won.In response, Lee Ik-yeon stated that the government is currently drafting relevant legislation, and the specific content of the shareholding restrictions can be further coordinated during the National Assembly review process, emphasizing that all opinions will be fully reflected in the design. He also mentioned that the government proposal for the "Digital Asset Basic Law" is undergoing final coordination and will be submitted as soon as possible, although no specific timeline has been announced.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.