BTC $72,594.07 +4.70%
ETH $2,312.08 +1.87%
BNB $653.63 +3.37%
XRP $1.26 +11.13%
SOL $87.28 +1.57%
TRX $0.3397 +1.97%
DOGE $0.0791 +5.19%
ADA $0.1962 +3.14%
BCH $221.81 +4.59%
LINK $10.52 -1.75%
HYPE $74.02 +3.43%
AAVE $97.56 +1.69%
SUI $0.7310 +2.26%
XLM $0.1802 +5.24%
ZEC $566.91 +0.10%
BTC $72,594.07 +4.70%
ETH $2,312.08 +1.87%
BNB $653.63 +3.37%
XRP $1.26 +11.13%
SOL $87.28 +1.57%
TRX $0.3397 +1.97%
DOGE $0.0791 +5.19%
ADA $0.1962 +3.14%
BCH $221.81 +4.59%
LINK $10.52 -1.75%
HYPE $74.02 +3.43%
AAVE $97.56 +1.69%
SUI $0.7310 +2.26%
XLM $0.1802 +5.24%
ZEC $566.91 +0.10%

term

All
Article
Flash

hot_img Cryptocurrency, AI, and betting companies drive corporate political spending to a record high in the 2026 midterm elections

According to a report by Reuters, American companies have invested a record $517 million in the congressional elections for the House and Senate in 2026 over the 15 months ending in the first quarter of 2026, surpassing the previous high of $461 million during the two-year 2024 election cycle. The cryptocurrency, technology, and online betting industries contributed at least $294 million, becoming a major force in shaping the midterm elections.The Fairshake super PAC, primarily funded by Coinbase, Ripple, and a16z, had $193 million in funding at the beginning of the year and currently has about $130 million remaining; a16z has donated over $81 million to cryptocurrency and AI-related PACs. Elon Musk has invested over $90 million, and Meta has donated $65 million to four super PACs. The AI-related organization Leading the Future has raised $140 million, and Anthropic has donated at least $40 million through dark money non-profit organizations. Online betting companies like DraftKings and FanDuel have donated over $72 million.AdImpact expects total political ad spending for this round of midterm elections to reach a record $11.6 billion. Related industries are making unlimited expenditures through super PACs, affiliated PACs, and dark money non-profit organizations for advertising, voter mobilization, and more, with critics arguing that this amplifies the influence of niche issues such as cryptocurrency regulation, data center energy, and betting regulation.

hot_img The Shanghai court in China analyzes the criminal responsibility determination in cases of "traffic diversion" fraud involving virtual currency, which may constitute complicity in fraud or illegal use of information networks

The Shanghai Intermediate People's Court has published typical cases, analyzing whether "traffic personnel" involved in telecommunications network fraud related to virtual currencies constitute accomplices in fraud. From February 2022 to April 2023, the defendants, for the purpose of profit, assisted upstream fraudulent activities by "draining traffic," using online virtual phone software to lure victims into related scam groups, ultimately causing 30 victims to be defrauded of more than 2.34 million yuan (the same currency hereafter) by an overseas fraudulent organization. The overseas fraudulent organization transferred funds into the suspects' trading accounts via virtual currency.The Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court pointed out that in telecommunications network fraud cases, "traffic personnel" may constitute accomplices in fraud or illegal use of information networks depending on specific circumstances. The key lies in determining whether they have formed a clear criminal intent connection with the upstream fraudulent organization and whether there is stable cooperation and division of labor. In judicial practice, when assessing the criminal responsibility of "traffic personnel," factors such as their role in the criminal chain, the degree of organizational management, connections with upstream criminals, methods of profit, and abnormal behavior should be comprehensively considered. Actions that only provide general online services and do not form a conspiracy to commit fraud should be distinguished from "draining" actions that knowingly participate in the implementation of fraud.

HSBC requires some existing investment clients in the mainland to submit a source of funds declaration; failure to submit in a timely manner may result in service termination

According to the Daily Economic News, following the requirement to confirm that the source of funds for new account openings comes from legal overseas channels, some banks in Hong Kong have begun to initiate a source of funds declaration process for certain existing mainland investment clients. HSBC Hong Kong has recently started notifying some existing mainland investment clients, requiring them to submit the "Declaration for Opening/Maintaining Accounts" through the HSBC Hong Kong App by September 12 and to update their contact information.The declaration includes confirming that the funds for investment activities come from legal sources outside mainland China, and that the bank may disclose personal information at the request of law enforcement or regulatory agencies. The notice also mentioned that if the declaration is not submitted by August 20, investment-related services may be suspended; if it is still not submitted by September 12, investment-related services may be terminated.An HSBC spokesperson responded that they will follow relevant regulatory requirements when managing investment client relationships, thus inviting relevant mainland Chinese investors to provide self-declarations and confirm that the information provided in their "Know Your Customer" and "Customer Due Diligence" processes is current and valid, which helps to continuously provide uninterrupted services to clients. HSBC emphasized that this latest declaration requirement applies only to investment service clients.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.