Scan to download
BTC $63,769.65 +1.34%
ETH $1,672.15 +0.86%
BNB $602.80 +0.66%
XRP $1.12 +0.89%
SOL $67.22 +1.54%
TRX $0.3153 +0.77%
DOGE $0.0869 +1.67%
ADA $0.1731 +2.81%
BCH $207.29 +2.68%
LINK $7.95 +1.99%
HYPE $58.79 +2.48%
AAVE $66.13 +4.43%
SUI $0.7629 +1.84%
XLM $0.1895 -0.09%
ZEC $413.80 -1.63%
BTC $63,769.65 +1.34%
ETH $1,672.15 +0.86%
BNB $602.80 +0.66%
XRP $1.12 +0.89%
SOL $67.22 +1.54%
TRX $0.3153 +0.77%
DOGE $0.0869 +1.67%
ADA $0.1731 +2.81%
BCH $207.29 +2.68%
LINK $7.95 +1.99%
HYPE $58.79 +2.48%
AAVE $66.13 +4.43%
SUI $0.7629 +1.84%
XLM $0.1895 -0.09%
ZEC $413.80 -1.63%

rns

The Coinbase Advisory Council warns of quantum risks to Bitcoin, the community still lacks consensus, and preparations for quantum resistance migration should be initiated immediately

The advisory committee of cryptographic experts led by Coinbase has released a report stating that Bitcoin should immediately begin preparing for potential quantum computing attacks. However, the committee did not take a clear stance on whether to freeze the millions of Bitcoins that could potentially be stolen by quantum computing in the future.It is reported that the committee members include several leading experts, such as Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, who believe that the current focus of the debate is not on how to introduce quantum-resistant signature technology, but rather on how to handle the Bitcoins that have not been migrated for a long time. One viewpoint calls for setting a deadline, after which the existing ECDSA and Schnorr signature schemes for Bitcoin will cease to be supported, and un-migrated assets will be frozen to prevent future quantum attackers from acquiring large amounts of BTC and impacting the market. Another viewpoint argues that this amounts to asset confiscation, contradicting Bitcoin's core principles of "immutability and user complete control of assets," and could set a precedent for freezing assets in the future due to regulatory pressure.The Coinbase advisory committee pointed out that the aforementioned proposals are not mutually exclusive and can be combined, but it refused to take a position on the issue of "whether to freeze legacy BTC," believing that the final decision should be governed by the Bitcoin community. At the same time, it emphasized two points: first, the technical development of quantum-resistant signature migration should be initiated immediately and should not wait for the governance debate to conclude; second, it is necessary to clearly communicate risk information to users to avoid long-term uncertainty affecting the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The Bank of Japan may face its highest interest rate decision in over 30 years, and concerns about severe fluctuations in the yen have arisen as the deputy governor takes over

The Bank of Japan will hold a key monetary policy meeting next Tuesday, with the market widely expecting an interest rate hike of 25 basis points to 1%, marking the highest interest rate level since 1995 and signaling a further move towards normalization of Japan's monetary policy. However, uncertainty surrounding this meeting has significantly increased. Governor Kazuo Ueda will be absent from the meeting and the subsequent press conference due to health reasons, with communication responsibilities taken over by Deputy Governor Shinichi Uchida, raising market concerns about changes in policy wording and forward guidance.Currently, the USD/JPY has risen above 160, nearing a two-year high and approaching the intervention zone. Traders generally believe that, given the market has fully priced in the interest rate hike expectations, the real key lies in the central bank's stance on the future path of interest rate hikes. Institutional analysis indicates that if the Bank of Japan releases dovish signals, it could further weaken the yen and push up Japanese government bond yields; conversely, if it shows a clearer tightening tendency, it would help stabilize exchange rate expectations.At the same time, Japan is facing multiple constraints such as rising imported inflationary pressures, fluctuations in energy prices, and expectations of fiscal expansion, making the policy path more complex. The latest data shows that Japan's core inflation has risen to 3.5%, reaching a new high for this phase. Analysts believe that this meeting is not only a point for interest rate adjustments but may also serve as an important observation window for changes in the Bank of Japan's policy communication framework, with the Deputy Governor's statements directly influencing the short-term direction of the yen and global interest rate markets.

The founder of Strategy claims that the decline in BTC is due to the rotation of funds into AI rather than "issues with Bitcoin itself," and JPMorgan warns that the legislative window for the CLARITY Act is closing

According to BBX data, Bitcoin fell to a new low of $61,300 this year yesterday, putting pressure on the cryptocurrency sector. Key signals have emerged from institutions and the legislative level, with the core dynamics as follows:Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, Inc. (NASDAQ: $MSTR), publicly stated on June 4 that the current decline in Bitcoin is not due to a deterioration in BTC fundamentals, but rather a "phase rotation" of capital from Bitcoin to AI stocks, SpaceX IPO, and other emerging assets—"Bitcoin is not broken; it’s just temporarily not the main character in the momentum trade." Saylor also reiterated his position of continued accumulation. Previously, Strategy spent approximately $2.01 billion (average price $80,985) to acquire 24,869 BTC in the week from May 11 to 17, bringing their total holdings to 843,738 BTC with a total cost of about $63.87 billion (average price $75,700); currently, BTC has fallen below the cost line of $12,300, and all of the company's holdings are in a state of unrealized loss, but management has not publicly indicated any intention to reduce their positions.JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: $JPM) reported by CoinDesk on June 4 warned in its latest research report that the legislative time window for the CLARITY Act to be voted on by the full Senate is "rapidly narrowing." The wording discrepancies in the stablecoin yield provisions have evolved into the most critical unresolved obstacle for the bill—banks insist on retaining restrictions on "passive income," while the cryptocurrency industry strives for "activity incentive space." If a compromise cannot be reached between the two parties within this month, the timeline for the Senate to complete a 60-vote approval before July 4 will be completely invalidated; the report also pointed out that the capital siphoning effect from the SpaceX IPO and AI stocks has further suppressed institutions' willingness to allocate to BTC in the short term.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.