BTC $66,804.64 +3.89%
ETH $1,935.10 +3.87%
BNB $574.72 +1.42%
XRP $1.13 +5.03%
SOL $78.11 +2.55%
TRX $0.3285 +0.99%
DOGE $0.0731 +1.32%
ADA $0.1757 +8.07%
BCH $225.56 +4.75%
LINK $8.69 +3.88%
HYPE $62.10 +2.03%
AAVE $94.25 +5.67%
SUI $0.7664 +1.74%
XLM $0.1935 +4.06%
ZEC $544.27 +2.45%
BTC $66,804.64 +3.89%
ETH $1,935.10 +3.87%
BNB $574.72 +1.42%
XRP $1.13 +5.03%
SOL $78.11 +2.55%
TRX $0.3285 +0.99%
DOGE $0.0731 +1.32%
ADA $0.1757 +8.07%
BCH $225.56 +4.75%
LINK $8.69 +3.88%
HYPE $62.10 +2.03%
AAVE $94.25 +5.67%
SUI $0.7664 +1.74%
XLM $0.1935 +4.06%
ZEC $544.27 +2.45%

regulatory

All
Article
Flash

The FATF has released the seventh update report on the implementation of virtual asset standards, calling for the closure of regulatory gaps

According to the latest report released by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), FATF conducted the seventh special assessment of the implementation of Recommendation 15 (R.15) across global jurisdictions. The report indicates that since the last update in 2025, countries have continued to advance in the regulation of virtual assets (VA) and virtual asset service providers (VASP), including conducting risk assessments, improving licensing and registration frameworks, implementing travel rules, and strengthening law enforcement actions.However, the report also points out that significant gaps still exist, mainly reflected in: the difficulty in effectively translating risk assessment results into mitigation measures, insufficient implementation of licensing and registration frameworks, challenges in identifying VASP activity subjects, and inadequate effectiveness of risk-based supervision and law enforcement. In terms of emerging risks, the report focuses on the following areas: the exacerbation of the "industrialization" trend of organized crime groups using virtual assets to commit fraud, the rising risk of stablecoin abuse, risks associated with non-custodial wallet peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions, offshore VASPs operating outside of regulation, and ongoing challenges in the DeFi sector. FATF calls for the public and private sectors to jointly strengthen the implementation of R.15, enhance risk mitigation capabilities, and deepen domestic, international, and public-private cooperation mechanisms.

Bitcoin Depot layoffs conclude with liquidation, SoFiUSD welcomes the implementation of the GENIUS Act regulatory judgment

According to BBX data, over the weekend, cryptocurrency concept stocks faced two significant substantive events related to publicly listed companies, with the core dynamics as follows:Bitcoin Depot Inc. (Nasdaq: $BTM, bankruptcy proceedings ongoing) completed all executive termination arrangements announced in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy restructuring process on July 17. According to the Form 8-K submitted to the SEC on May 18, 2026 (disclosed under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, WARN Act), the company issued layoff notices to all employees and executives immediately after filing for bankruptcy on May 17, with last Friday being the "expected effective date." Bitcoin Depot is one of the largest Bitcoin ATM operators in the United States (with over 7,000 machines in the U.S. and Canada at its peak), and its bankruptcy is one of the most representative cases of the collapse of a cryptocurrency infrastructure company during the 2026 bear market. The corresponding regulatory background includes: CFPB's enforcement pressure on cryptocurrency ATM service fees, tightening licensing requirements for cryptocurrency ATMs in various states, and a decline in retail cryptocurrency purchase volumes due to the bear market. Meanwhile, industry-wide pressures faced by similar companies providing ATM cash-to-crypto services, such as Coinstar, Coin Cloud, and PaySign, are also intensifying. Documents related to the restructuring process have been made public on the Kroll (claims agent) platform, and creditors can track progress at restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bitcoindepot.SoFi Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: $SOFI), as the only stablecoin directly issued by a U.S. national bank regulated by the OCC (SoFi Bank, N.A.), launched SoFiUSD on May 27. Over the weekend (July 18), it became the most direct regulatory test subject under the new framework as the deadline for the GENIUS Act regulatory agency's Customer Identification Program (CIP) rules approached. Regulators must finalize the CIP rules for the GENIUS Act by July 18, clarifying which stablecoin issuers can legally operate in the U.S. and the BSA/AML standards they must meet; there is a risk that the complete rule text may not be produced on time (there is a risk of delay), but even partial clarification of the framework will have a direct impact on SoFiUSD. SoFi's advantage lies in the fact that, as an issuer holding an OCC national bank charter, SoFiUSD falls under the category of "federally chartered stablecoin" in the GENIUS Act classification system, theoretically eligible for the most favorable regulatory treatment; Q1 2026 cryptocurrency trading revenue was $121.6 million, with a net income of approximately $852,000 after deducting costs in the cryptocurrency division. The stablecoin business is still in the early stages of strategic layout, with limited revenue contribution in the short term, but the establishment of the regulatory framework will determine the mid-term commercialization path.

David Sacks: Opposes using regulatory uncertainty to suppress open-source AI, warns that the AI duopoly is seeking to eliminate competition

David Sacks, Chairman of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, stated on the X platform that using regulatory uncertainty as a competitive tool is "completely unacceptable." Regulatory decisions should be based on facts, logic, and evidence, rather than deliberately creating fear and uncertainty (FUD). He is unsure whether venture capitalist and AI policy researcher Dean Ball is acknowledging a strategy of "regulatory capture" or merely predicting that such a situation will occur. However, in any case, the practice of issuing "soft law" warnings through regulatory agencies to create market panic, thereby forcing regulated companies away from Chinese open-source models, should not be accepted.David Sacks pointed out that Dean Ball believes there is no need to directly ban Chinese open-source models; it is sufficient to guide regulatory agencies to issue relevant warnings, which can influence corporate decision-making by creating enough doubt and uncertainty, and these reasons "do not even need to be very substantial." Any regulatory decision must have sufficient basis, rather than implementing policies by "artificially creating doubt." He warned that this practice of circumventing public deliberation procedures not only undermines the foundation of the rule of law but may also open the door to regulatory abuse against any company or individual in the future.David Sacks further stated that current AI policy is at a critical turning point. Leading closed-source laboratories, which have already formed a duopoly in AI model revenue, are attempting to use government power to eliminate open-source competitors. He called on other companies and developers in Silicon Valley that still support open competition to make clear statements to jointly maintain an open ecosystem in the field of AI.

first_img DeepMind co-founder claims AGI could be achieved within a few years, calls for the establishment of a cutting-edge AI standards regulatory body

According to reports, Google DeepMind co-founder Demis Hassabis recently predicted that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be achieved in just a few years, with its transformative impact reaching ten times that of the Industrial Revolution, and its development speed accelerating tenfold. He pointed out that as the potential risks of cutting-edge models in areas such as cybersecurity, nuclear energy, and biology become increasingly prominent, the industry urgently needs to establish robust security protections for future AI systems that possess autonomy and self-improvement capabilities.To balance technological innovation and security risks, Hassabis called for the United States to take the lead in establishing a "Frontier AI Standards Agency" similar to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). This agency is proposed to operate under a public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization model, managed by independent technical experts and representatives from the open-source community, primarily funded through industry contributions. Its core function is to develop dynamic scientific assessment protocols, initially requiring frontier laboratories to voluntarily submit for review 30 days prior to the release of models, with plans to eventually transition to mandatory market entry testing, while non-frontier models from startups or academic institutions would be exempt. This framework aims to address unknown crises through a technology-driven review mechanism and to promote a global consensus on AI risk management within the international community.

The White House Crypto Council states that the CLARITY Act faces a crucial week, with the industry focusing on the U.S. crypto regulatory process

Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett posted on the X platform that Patrick Witt, the Executive Director of the White House Cryptocurrency Council, stated that this week will be a "critical week" in the advancement of the U.S. CLARITY Act. As the crypto industry prepares to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the GENIUS Act officially becoming law, the construction of the U.S. digital asset regulatory framework has once again become a focal point for the market.Patrick Witt mentioned that the current U.S. crypto policy is at an important stage, and the advancement of the CLARITY Act will have significant implications for the market structure of digital assets, the division of regulatory responsibilities, and the future development direction of the industry.Previously, the CLARITY Act was regarded as one of the important legislations for establishing comprehensive regulatory rules for the U.S. crypto market, aiming to clarify the classification of digital assets, the authority of regulatory agencies, and the compliance requirements for market participants.Market participants believe that if the bill makes substantial progress, it could further enhance regulatory certainty for the U.S. crypto industry and impact the future strategies of exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and blockchain companies.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.