Scan to download
BTC $65,739.94 -2.81%
ETH $1,822.20 -5.35%
BNB $623.97 -6.04%
XRP $1.22 -1.71%
SOL $72.98 -5.08%
TRX $0.3336 -1.26%
DOGE $0.0921 -3.68%
ADA $0.2089 -3.82%
BCH $245.98 -13.60%
LINK $8.27 -4.18%
HYPE $71.98 +0.02%
AAVE $74.93 -1.89%
SUI $0.8191 -1.47%
XLM $0.2226 -0.33%
ZEC $596.91 -3.99%
BTC $65,739.94 -2.81%
ETH $1,822.20 -5.35%
BNB $623.97 -6.04%
XRP $1.22 -1.71%
SOL $72.98 -5.08%
TRX $0.3336 -1.26%
DOGE $0.0921 -3.68%
ADA $0.2089 -3.82%
BCH $245.98 -13.60%
LINK $8.27 -4.18%
HYPE $71.98 +0.02%
AAVE $74.93 -1.89%
SUI $0.8191 -1.47%
XLM $0.2226 -0.33%
ZEC $596.91 -3.99%

timeline

Overview of the 2026 Q2 crypto project TGE timeline, MegaETH becomes the core anchor point of this round's window period

Web3 asset data platform RootData released the progress data for the 2026 Q2 TGE. From the time distribution perspective, the crypto market is entering a concentrated release period for Q2 TGE, with market risk appetite and liquidity activity rebounding in sync. Among them, MegaETH has become the core anchor point of this window period. This project focuses on "ultra-high performance real-time execution" of EVM L2. After completing a $30 million financing, it officially TGE'd on April 30 and simultaneously launched on major exchanges such as Coinbase, Upbit, and Bithumb. According to the "Upcoming Issuance" section data from RootData's market, TGE is showing characteristics of a "short-term concentrated explosion": on April 29, Gensyn completed its TGE, on the 30th, MegaETH and Real Finance TGE'd simultaneously, and on May 1, Kuvi followed closely with its launch. Avant is expected to push forward its TGE in the latter part of Q2. At the same time, Polymarket data also provided forward-looking signals: before June, it may enter a peak issuance interval. Dreamcash (64%), Arc (46%), and Oro (40%) are in the first tier and may form the core of the next liquidity competition. Overall, this round of Q2 TGE is not a confirmation signal for the market but rather the starting point for liquidity redistribution. The subsequent market strength will depend on the absorption capacity of the new supply and the degree of support from the project's fundamentals for valuation.

Vitalik: Shift in attitude towards supporting native Rollups, ZK timeline gradually maturing

Vitalik Buterin stated that he is "significantly more inclined to support native rollups" compared to the past. Vitalik recalled that a major reason for opposing native rollups previously was that their precompiled solutions had to choose between ZK mode or Optimistic mode, and at that time, ZK-EVM was not mature. L2 often chose the latter, which involved "fast withdrawals but self-proving risks" versus "relying on Ethereum's security but needing to wait 2-7 days for withdrawals," thereby weakening Ethereum's composability and promoting the prevalence of multi-signature bridges and other solutions.Vitalik pointed out that the situation is changing: Ethereum's timeline for fully adopting ZK at the L1 level is gradually aligning with the realistic progress of introducing native rollup precompiles, and the aforementioned core obstacles are expected to be eliminated. He also mentioned that the community is increasingly viewing "synchronous composability" as one of the core values of L2 and is exploring the combination of rollup-based solutions with low-latency pre-confirmation mechanisms.In addition, Vitalik emphasized that the design of native rollup precompiles should not be rushed in its implementation. He expressed a hope that in the future, there would be a property such that if developers build a rollup that is "EVM plus a small amount of extended functionality," they could directly reuse the EVM part of the native rollup precompiles and only introduce a custom proof system for the new features, connecting the two in a standardized way.

Vitalik: Shift in attitude towards supporting native Rollups, ZK timeline gradually matures

Vitalik Buterin stated that he is "significantly more inclined to support native rollups" compared to the past. Vitalik reflected that a key reason for opposing native rollups previously was that their precompiled solutions had to choose between ZK mode or Optimistic mode, and at that time, ZK-EVM was not mature. L2 often chose the latter option, which involved "fast withdrawals but self-bear proof risks" versus "relying on Ethereum's security but needing to wait 2-7 days for withdrawals," thereby weakening Ethereum's composability and promoting the proliferation of multi-signature bridge solutions.Vitalik pointed out that the situation is changing: Ethereum's timeline for fully adopting ZK at the L1 level is gradually aligning with the realistic progress of introducing native rollup precompiles, and the aforementioned core obstacles are expected to be eliminated. He also mentioned that the community is increasingly viewing "synchronous composability" as one of the core values of L2 and is exploring the combination of rollup-based solutions with low-latency pre-confirmation mechanisms.Additionally, Vitalik emphasized that the design of native rollup precompiles should not be rushed in its specific implementation. He expressed a hope that in the future, there would be a property such that if developers build a rollup that is "EVM with a small amount of extended functionality," they can directly reuse the EVM part of the native rollup precompiles and only introduce a custom proof system for the new features, connecting the two in a standardized way.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.