BTC $82,594.28 +1.89%
ETH $2,476.77 +4.63%
BNB $733.67 +1.76%
XRP $1.35 +2.87%
SOL $106.63 +4.01%
TRX $0.3353 +1.34%
DOGE $0.0826 +2.74%
ADA $0.2324 +4.61%
BCH $282.77 +7.03%
LINK $12.72 +5.29%
HYPE $82.08 +3.64%
AAVE $164.64 +10.06%
SUI $1.05 +7.61%
XLM $0.1852 +2.81%
ZEC $1,240.47 +13.01%
AAPL $343.78 -0.59%
AMZN $255.38 +2.08%
GOOGL $350.11 +1.39%
MSFT $542.04 +1.85%
META $740.14 +1.02%
NVDA $216.86 -0.59%
TSLA $374.23 +3.14%
SNDK $1,359.85 +1.15%
INTC $94.28 -0.52%
SPCX $150.66 +1.13%
MU $908.62 +3.30%
AMD $552.23 -0.60%
BTC $82,594.28 +1.89%
ETH $2,476.77 +4.63%
BNB $733.67 +1.76%
XRP $1.35 +2.87%
SOL $106.63 +4.01%
TRX $0.3353 +1.34%
DOGE $0.0826 +2.74%
ADA $0.2324 +4.61%
BCH $282.77 +7.03%
LINK $12.72 +5.29%
HYPE $82.08 +3.64%
AAVE $164.64 +10.06%
SUI $1.05 +7.61%
XLM $0.1852 +2.81%
ZEC $1,240.47 +13.01%
AAPL $343.78 -0.59%
AMZN $255.38 +2.08%
GOOGL $350.11 +1.39%
MSFT $542.04 +1.85%
META $740.14 +1.02%
NVDA $216.86 -0.59%
TSLA $374.23 +3.14%
SNDK $1,359.85 +1.15%
INTC $94.28 -0.52%
SPCX $150.66 +1.13%
MU $908.62 +3.30%
AMD $552.23 -0.60%

liquidity

All
Article
Flash

IMF: The market size of tokenized RWA is approximately 65 billion USD, which may become a new channel for leverage accumulation and liquidity risk

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) released the October "Global Financial Stability Report," which for the first time discusses the tokenized market in a dedicated chapter. The report shows that as of the end of July, the public market size of tokenized Real World Assets (RWA), excluding repos and stablecoins, is approximately $65 billion, with credit accounting for about $30.4 billion, money market funds about $17.5 billion, and stocks about $2.3 billion. The average daily trading volume of tokenized repos over 30 days reached $303 billion.The report states that the issuance of tokenized stocks is highly concentrated, with Ondo Finance and Backed Finance (xStocks) together accounting for over 70%. More than 50% of trades occur outside regular trading hours for U.S. stocks, with about 80% of trade sizes being less than one share, volatility being about 1.5 times that of traditional markets, and liquidity being significantly lower.The IMF believes that while the scale of tokenized assets is small, it may bring efficiency improvements in multiple areas, but it could also create new channels for leverage accumulation and liquidity and maturity mismatches, exacerbating technological and infrastructure risks, with current systemic risks remaining limited. The IMF also pointed out that in the absence of interoperable central bank currencies, stablecoins and tokenized deposits may become the main settlement tools in the tokenized capital market, leading to issuer credit risk and concentration risk.

Analysts rebut the argument that Ethereum's liquidity moat has been breached: ETH still holds value as a reserve asset, with 36% of the supply already staked

Blockworks analyst Jake Koch-Gallup published a rebuttal to the viewpoint that Ethereum is losing its liquidity moat, arguing that despite the challenges to ETH's value capture ability and stablecoin market share, its reserve asset characteristics, Layer 2 ecosystem, and institutional adoption still constitute a long-term competitive advantage.In response to the issue of low on-chain revenue for Ethereum, Jake pointed out that ETH's valuation depends not only on actual economic value (REV) but also includes reserve asset and collateral premiums, with ETH's market capitalization currently about 1,100 times the REV of the past 12 months. Additionally, the development of Layer 2 networks such as Robinhood Chain and Base can still strengthen the Ethereum ecosystem, rather than indicating that funds and applications are completely leaving Ethereum. Jake also noted that Ethereum currently accounts for about 65% of the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi, with approximately 45% of the on-chain managed scale in real-world assets (RWA), while spot ETFs and corporate treasuries collectively hold about 13% of the total ETH supply, and about 36% of the ETH supply is currently staked.Although Ethereum's stablecoin market share has gradually faced dilution pressure from around 51%, Jake believes that as the overall stablecoin market expands, its absolute scale may continue to grow. However, Jake also acknowledged that relying solely on ETH's reserve asset premium, without sufficient revenue and value return mechanisms, raises questions about its valuation sustainability.

ESMA: Soliciting opinions to assess the liquidity of tokenized collateral during the crisis

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has released a consultation document to gather feedback from the industry on the risks associated with tokenized collateral in terms of legality, liquidity, and operations. This is to assess whether clearinghouses can acquire and liquidate relevant assets under market pressure and to determine if new EU regulatory measures are needed. ESMA Chair Verena Ross stated that legal certainty, infrastructure interoperability, and appropriate regulation are necessary to create conditions for the safe cross-border operation and scalable development of the tokenized market.Tokenized collateral is entering the European clearing business, allowing banks and investors to more quickly obtain securities to meet margin requirements. This assessment will also review whether current EU rules can support clearinghouses in acquiring and clearing tokenized collateral in the event of member defaults. In July 2025, Eurex Clearing will launch a collateral service based on distributed ledger technology, and JPMorgan has completed its first real-time transaction for Dutch pension investor PGGM.ESMA will also evaluate the tokenized forms of assets held by traditional financial infrastructure, assets originally issued on distributed ledgers, and their relationship with stablecoins, central bank currencies, and tokenized deposits. The European Central Bank system will launch Pontes in September 2025 for settling tokenized asset transactions in central bank currency, which can connect blockchain infrastructure with existing settlement systems.

Bitcoin collateralized lending accelerates towards mainstream: expanding from trading financing to real needs such as tuition fees and corporate turnover

Bitcoin collateralized lending is gradually expanding from a cryptocurrency financial scene focused on trading and investment to real credit needs such as tuition fees, living expenses, business operating funds, and real estate, showing a significant change in market usage. Institutions like SALT Lending and Ledn indicate that more and more borrowers are choosing to collateralize BTC for liquidity instead of selling their holdings.Since its establishment in 2018, Ledn has issued loans totaling over $11 billion and expects this scale to grow to $1 trillion in the coming years. Its clients include entrepreneurs and institutional investors seeking operating funds, as well as individuals borrowing to pay for children's education, real estate investments, and short-term living expenses. This trend indicates that the financial attributes of BTC are extending from "tradable assets" further to "collateralizable assets." Borrowers hope to unlock its value without selling BTC while still retaining potential upside exposure.At the same time, institutions like SALT are promoting fixed-rate, long-term products, bringing crypto collateralized loans closer to traditional credit models like home mortgages. Coinbase has also recently launched fixed-rate BTC collateralized loans through Morpho. Ledn further anticipates that similar models may expand from BTC to traditional hard assets like gold, and the boundaries of the collateralized asset lending market are widening.

Hunter Biden: The LAPTOP team did not cash out, the market maker caused the token to plummet

According to market news, Hunter Biden, the son of former U.S. President Biden, announced the results of an independent investigation into the launch of the LAPTOP token, stating that he has commissioned the forensic company Groom Lake to verify all transactions on the day of the launch. He denied that the team cashed out, stating that the founder's tokens remain concentrated in the same wallet and have not been transferred since the launch; his personal tokens have been locked for six months and will be released over two years.He cited the investigation, stating that Market Maker 1 had $500,000 in startup capital but only invested about $5,200 and less than 30,000 tokens into the liquidity pool, which accounted for only 0.003% of the total supply. The extremely low liquidity caused the price to rise from $0.05 to about $317 in less than two minutes, followed by a 98% drop within the next hour. After the price peaked 84 seconds later, Market Maker 1 withdrew funds during the sell-off, causing the available funds to support sell orders to drop from $16,200 to zero, close to the current price.He stated that Market Maker 1's DEX position made a profit of about $686,000, while Market Maker 2's related DEX transactions netted over $2.1 million, and he believes that the market maker responsible for the launch issues should buy back and destroy the tokens. He stated that he takes ultimate responsibility, will not exit the project, and plans to destroy most of the unclaimed tokens from the first airdrop next week; this airdrop accounts for 10% of the total supply.

U.S. Senate Investigation: USDT is a key liquidity channel for Iran's shadow banking, Gulf VASP faces higher sanction risks

A report from the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) identifies stablecoins, particularly USDT, as a key liquidity channel supporting Iran's shadow banking system. Licensed virtual asset service providers (VASP) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region face heightened sanctions compliance pressure and need to enhance wallet ownership identification and counterparty assessment.Soham Jethani, a partner at the law firm Septten, stated that merchants settling crypto assets into local fiat currency do not necessarily avoid sanctions risks. Liability may involve designated entities, the provision of funds or economic resources, and asset handling within the transaction chain, potentially arising before the final settlement by banks. Jethani pointed out that the name of the stablecoin or the currency in which it is priced does not determine legal ownership; specific rights depend on contractual arrangements and actual payment processes.Globally circulating stablecoins may also pose secondary sanctions risks, as indirect or historical wallet associations do not automatically constitute violations and must be assessed in conjunction with applicable regulations, transaction participants, and specific facts. In regulated markets like the UAE, licensed exchange wallets are continuously monitored, and related funds can be frozen before consumption settlements, with merchants also required to complete KYC. Regulated VASPs handling deposits and withdrawals bear the responsibility for counterparty and sanctions risk assessment and corresponding controls.

Gate Europe accelerates the expansion of the European market, with MiCA compliance foundation and liquidity construction advancing simultaneously

According to U.Today, as the EU MiCA transition period ended on July 1, obtaining MiCA authorization has become an important foundation for cryptocurrency trading platforms to continue serving European users. Gate Europe obtained MiCA authorization before the end of the transition period and expanded related services through the European Economic Area passport mechanism. Gate data shows that from June 16 to September 22, the platform added at least 68 new spot trading pairs, currently covering about 190 assets and 382 trading pairs.The article cites data from CASP Tracker, indicating that as of September 28, 84 out of the world's largest 100 cryptocurrency trading platforms have not yet obtained MiCA authorization. Meanwhile, Gate Europe passed the PCI DSS v4.0.1 Level 1 compliance assessment on September 15, covering Gate Connect and Gate Card. Gate Europe CEO Dr. Giovanni Cunti stated that security and compliance are key to building trusted payment services in Europe, and obtaining PCI DSS certification is an important step in strengthening payment infrastructure.In terms of liquidity, Gate data shows that from September 14 to 27, the order book depth for BTC/USDC and ETH/USDC within 0.1% of the midpoint increased by approximately 14% and 12%, reaching $1.32 million and $555,000, respectively. Meanwhile, DefiLlama MiCA exchange data shows that the depth of Gate Europe's spot market within 2% of the midpoint reached $15.9 million, higher than other platforms during the same period. Relying on the compliant foundation built on the dual licenses of MiCA and Payment Institutions (PI), Gate Europe will continue to improve asset coverage and liquidity construction, providing European users with a richer selection of digital asset trading options and a better trading experience.

first_img Ethereum's increase in the third quarter surpassed Bitcoin, but its liquidity has clearly narrowed compared to Bitcoin

According to a report by CoinGecko, Ethereum's native token ETH outperformed Bitcoin in the third quarter, with a price increase of 70%, surpassing Bitcoin's 42% increase. However, during the same period, ETH's liquidity significantly narrowed compared to Bitcoin.From July 6 to September 30, the average daily market median depth of ETH was only 35% to 45% of Bitcoin's, while it was at least 60% during the same period last year. Market depth measures the total dollar value of buy and sell orders within a certain price range. The depth of ETH within a 0.15% price range was between 13 million to 14 million dollars. CoinGecko stated that ETH still maintained good liquidity in this range, with most exchanges having both buy and sell side depths exceeding 1 million dollars.The liquidity of other mainstream tokens is also thinning. Solana's SOL saw its depth within a 2% price range drop from about 28 million dollars per side last year to about 20 million dollars this year. XRP's total depth remained stable at around 30 million dollars, but the order book was biased towards buyers, with buy orders around 18 million dollars and sell orders around 14 million dollars. CoinGecko pointed out that XRP's market capitalization is about 40% higher than SOL, but the depth within the 2% price range is lower because SOL's average daily trading volume is still 25% higher than XRP.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.